A Terry Science Experiment: Redux

While sitting in the kick-off ASIC class this evening, a few unconnected things Dr. Ng and Dr. Sens said resonated with me. As Dr. Sens explained, one of the objectives of the course is to instill within everyone’s “personal discourse” (i.e. a topical phrase I just made up now which refers to the conversations we have with ourselves on particularly engaging topics) a reminder that there are always science and humanities-based point of views for any particular global issue.

Later on, Dr. Ng pulled up his poll on “which statements are not untrue” which arguably brought into light two questions addressing science literacy: one of science education, and the other of public communication (i.e. the bird choice). The way in which science is communicated through public media outlets can be as important as the material itself. That said, the meaning of the terminology used by both scientists and scientific journalists often misunderstood by the general public.

This came up in an earlier post of mine (here), written after I attended the Future Directions In Science Journalism Conference held at UBC last fall:

Although there was no shortage of interesting fodder for discussion at the conference, one particular chord rang loud and clear among all the journalists in the crowd: the definition of “theory”. Theory means very different things to scientists and the public. Furthermore, as it seems to me, many scientific words have been either anthropmorphized or over generalized by journalists, and thusly have taken on altered, unique definitions in the collective public mind.

So, given the large diversity of students enrolled in the course (and, hopefully reading this post…), I thought I’d ask you, future enlightened global citizen of planet Earth, how you might describe a few common scientific ideas that are also hot-button topics in popular science writing and news:

  • Nature
  • Ecology
  • Genome
  • Theory
  • Scientific method
  • Statistical uncertainty

Don’t worry about coming up with the “correct” answers, since that really isn’t the point of this exercise – keep it real.

I’ll start things off with a few of my own off-the-cuff definitions in the comments section below…

Related Topics


Dave Semeniuk spends hours locked up in his office, thinking about the role the oceans play in controlling global climate, and unique ways of studying it. He'd also like to shamelessly plug his art practice: davidsemeniuk.com

2 Responses to “A Terry Science Experiment: Redux”

  1. Dave Semeniuk

    Nature: everything around us = planet Earth

    Ecology: the study of systems in the natural environment; how biology interacts with biology, chemistry, physics, geology, etc. over a variety of spatial and temporal scales

    Theory: a set of logical, vigorously tested statements with predictive content that describe a natural phenomenon

  2. Monika

    Nature: The um…natural stuff that was on the earth before we got here, rather than the things that we made like concrete.

    Ecology: How organisms/animals interact with each other and their environment (also over a variety of spatial and temporal scales, and very widely inclusive)

Leave a Reply

Basic HTML is allowed. Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.