Why psychology isn’t science: Alex B. Berezow

A doctorate in microbiology wrote this piece about psychology not being science.

Why can we definitively say that? Because psychology often does not meet the five basic requirements for a field to be considered scientifically rigorous: clearly defined terminology, quantifiability, highly controlled experimental conditions, reproducibility and, finally, predictability and testability.

I’ve been out of school for a bit and am struggling to remember if – for example- ecology  or climate science meets those requirements too.

Related Topics

terryman

Leave a Reply

Basic HTML is allowed. Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.