Moving from Single Stories to Multiple Meanings-How Do You Get There?
Terry readers, I have a burning question. Actually that should be plural, because I have questions, and they relate to the TED talk below. (And really, please do be nice and participate. That’s one of the things that makes Terry* fun).
Back to the talk. In it, Chimamanda Adichie talks about the danger of a single story. She describes growing up in Nigeria, being surrounded by British and American literature and how as a result, her own stories featured characters talking about the weather and drinking ginger beer. (Side note: by a show of quick comments below, how many people have had this experience? For me, I read a ton of Enid Blyton/British boarding school novels in Malawi, and I completely identified with her descriptions. And like the little boy Jahangir in Rohinton Mistry’s novel Family Matters, I can almost taste roast beef, scones and cold milk when I think about Blyton’s descriptions of picnics) For Adichie, until she discovered other Nigerian writers, it didn’t occur to her that literature could feature people similar to herself, from her country, having experiences she had experienced, and foods she had actually tasted.
She goes on to say that when we show people as one thing over and over again, that is what they become. And it’s critical to understand that stories are dependent on power. Power not just to tell the story of another, but to make it the definitive story. And this matters because stories do. They have the power to rob people of dignity, but they have the power to repair dignity as well.
Really, it’s an amazing talk that’s well worth the 18 minute investment. After listening and watching though, I want to ask: what are things that you do in your daily life/experiences to protect yourself from thinking in single stories? Are there ‘strategies’ (for lack of a better word) that you’ve found particularly useful in discovering the multiplicity that exists everywhere? What are challenges you face in learning about stories different from your own? Thinking back to power, how do you work through trying to be sensitive and respectful (less an issue when you’re reading a book perhaps, but more so when you’re talking to someone and trying to learn more), and knowing that one person’s experiences cannot account for a whole community, culture, city, country etc?
I realise that’s a lot of questions. But these are all questions I struggle with myself, so would love to talk and discuss all this a bit more..
One Response to “Moving from Single Stories to Multiple Meanings-How Do You Get There?”
This was an amazing talk! And I also relate very much to what Chimamanda Adichie talked about. As a child with East Indian heritage in the US, I read many American books and some British (like Enid Blyton) and learned a lot of American history. One day it struck me that I had a different history than all this American history I had been thinking of as my own and I was very confused …
In any case, I think that what she says is pretty relevant to the way people in Vancouver often think and talk about the Downtown Eastside, which can dehumanize the people there. There is a really interesting project called the Hope in Shadows calendar which aims to challenge this (http://www.hopeinshadows.com/). Over the past couple of years, volunteering at a transition house and listening to relevant speakers, such as someone who works for Hope in Shadows, has really pushed me to challenge the stereotypes with which I operate. I find I have to do make a conscious effort to do this. Sometimes it’s hard not to think of things in terms of stereotypes, especially when many people around you speak as if those stereotypes are true…. Is this something that other people find challenging to?
Anyways, thanks for posting this! I’m look forward to reading other people’s thoughts.