Make Bananas, Not Bombs
A friend of mine posted an interesting fact to Facebook today. Turns out that bananas give off a relatively high level of radiation compared to other foods. Many foods give off small amounts of radiation, but the level for bananas is particularly high, due to the presence of potassium-40. This has given rise to the Banana Equivalent Dose as a measure to compare the radiation found in foods following a nuclear accident. Specifically, the average radiation given off by a banana is 3520 picocuries per kg. A curie is 3.7×1010 decays per second, so 3520 picocuries (pico = 10-12) is a very small amount of radiation.

I wanted to put this number into perspective. Specifically, I wanted to compare the radiation given off by a banana to something more spectacular, like Little Boy, the nuclear bomb dropped on Hiroshima in World War 2. Doing so lead to some interesting and surprising results. Read on…
Disclaimer: I am not a physicist. Please do point out any mistakes I make in the following, it should be very interesting!
First of all, I wanted to know how many bananas it would take to equal the amount of radioactive material in the Hiroshima bomb. According to Wikipedia, Little Boy contained 65kg of Uranium. In reality it was only 80% enriched, but for simplicity I will round up to 100% Uranium-235, bearing in mind that modern nuclear bombs are much, much bigger than was Little Boy. The radioactive decay rate of this much Uranium can be determined by the equation:
![]()
Where:
- A = the radioactivity in decays per second (Becquerel)
- t1/2 = the half-life of Uranium-235 in seconds which is (703800000 years)*(31556926 seconds/year) = 2.22097645 * 1016 seconds
- N is the number of Uranium-235 atoms which is (64000 g)/(238.02891 g/mol) = 268.875 mol * 6.022141*1023 mol-1 = 1.6192*1026 molecules
(thank you to Ben Keller for reminding me how to do this)
Therefore, the activity of 65kg of Uranium is:

(note the conversion from Becquerel to Curie)
Comparing this to the 3520 picocuries per kg for a banana gives us the mass of bananas required to equal the radioactivity of one Little Boy:
![]()
So approximately 38788 metric tons of banana to equal the radioactivity of one Little Boy. Given that Wikipedia list the average weight of a banana as 125 grams, or 1 eighth of a kilogram, this equals approximately 310 307 272 bananas. That’d feed alot of monkeys.
It may seem like a lot, but according to Wikipedia, the world-wide production of bananas in 2007 was 72.5 million metric tons. This means that the radiation held by the world-wide production of bananas is approximately equivalent to 1870 Hiroshima bombs! Good thing we never get all those bananas in one place.
When I shared these preliminary results with some of my friends, one common train of thought that resulted from our discussion was “I wonder if dropping 38788 metric tons of banana would do as much damage as dropping a Hiroshima-sized nuclear bomb” (This should give you a rather terrifying insight into how my friends and I think).
First of all, how much area would be taken up by that much banana? To figure this our requires knowing the density of banana. Through Google, I found the value of 1.14 g/cm3 mentioned in several places. I couldn’t find the original source for this, but it seems like a reasonable value, given that it is only slightly above the density of water (1.00 g/cm3). Using the density we can determine the volume taken up by 38788 metric tons of banana:
![]()
If we assume that these bananas are packed into a sphere with no space in between, we can determine radius by using the equation for the volume of a sphere and solving for radius:

So this would be a sphere with a diameter of 40.6 meters… that’s alot of banana.
But how much damage would this do compared to the nuclear bomb? Well, obviously unlike the the bomb, no nuclear reaction will occur when the bananas hit the ground. But, there will be a large amount of kinetic energy. How much?
According to Wikipedia, Little Boy fell for 47 seconds before hitting the ground. Given that the gravitational acceleration on earth is 9.81 m/s2, this means that our ball of bananas will be travelling approximately 461 m/s when it hits the ground (ignoring drag, which will in reality reduce this speed). Plugging this into the equation for kinetic energy yields:

By comparison, Little Boy had a yield of 63 Terajoules. The nuclear bomb still does far more damage than our giant falling ball of banana.
Food for thought.
4 Responses to Make Bananas, Not Bombs
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
(Click on image to watch video)
OUR BLOGGERS
VINCI AU
posts | twitter
JESSIKA BAROI
posts
bobbi
posts| twitter | website
TREENA.C
posts | twitter | website
CHISALA CHAMAOMBE
posts | website
MICHELLE GYENES
posts| twitter
SALIMA HIRJI
posts | twitter

BETH HONG
posts | twitter | website
JEANNINE
posts| twitter | website
GORDON KATIC
posts| twitter | website
ALEC LEE
posts | website
DAVE SEMENUIK
posts| website | website
SARA SHAYAN
posts | web
JOSEPHINE XU
posts | twitter | website
KINOZHAO
posts| twitter
DAVID NG
posts| twitter | website
RECENT COMMENTS
- Submitted for your approval . . . | The Back of the Envelope on The Art of Science – The Science of Art?
- A biketopian vision « because she writes on Cycling for Everyone
- Some wise words for the weary. | I'm not really a scientist on Richard Kemick – Appraising Canada’s Future: Creating Value from Our Past – TEDxTerryTalks 2011
- Veronika Pizano on Be the artistic designer for the TEDx Terry Talks 2011!
- Brant on Laura Bain – Living with Bipolar Type II – TEDxTerryTalks 2011
- Haven on Pop bottle light bulb is pretty cool.
- Intelligence and Good Ideas | Terry on Education Failing on Failure
- This week: The “hide yer kids!” edition. | Terry on NOTES ON THE CLIMATE FIGHT (VIDEO) BILL McKIBBEN, NOVEMBER 16, 2011
- What Will You Do With The Things You Notice? (the beginnings of Idea Steep) « Seriously Planning on Game on. The Terry Tales dates are here! (We’ll bring the cookies, you bring the passion).
- Nika c. on Laura Bain – Living with Bipolar Type II – TEDxTerryTalks 2011
- Miriam on TEDxTerryTalks 2011. It’s a wrap!
- Miriam’s belated TEDx Terry Talks 2011 review | miriam on TEDxTerryTalks 2011. It’s a wrap!
- Liz on THE PROS AND CONS OF MOVING TO CANADA
- 2 Years Later,I’ve Got a Different Question (Reflections on Home and Travel) « Seriously Planning on Mini Terry Tales About Travel
- Sean on THE PROS AND CONS OF MOVING TO CANADA
POPULAR POSTS
- ASIC 200
- FAQ - Stem Cells (Sa Mix)
- ASIC 200 (COURSE OUTLINE 2012)
- Laura Bain - Living with Bipolar Type II - TEDxTerryTalks 2011
- TEDxTerryTalks
- THE PROS AND CONS OF MOVING TO CANADA
- Richard Kemick - Appraising Canada's Future: Creating Value from Our Past - TEDxTerryTalks 2011
- ASIC 200: The Group Problem Based Learning (PBL) Assignment - 2012
- ABOUT
FOLLOW TERRY!
- I just unlocked the 6-month graphs on #twittercounter. Find out more http://t.co/bYb9FCoC via @TheCounter #paidwithatweet 10 9 hours ago
- RT @ubcalumni: Tired of hearing about #sustainability? So are we. Join us for #UBC Dialogues Mar. 1 & learn how to take action http://t. ... 10 2012/02/17
- The Terry Project Podcast #7: Climate Change, Conservation, and Collapse. Available now! http://t.co/jbgjzTn8 @SustainUBC @raulpacheco 10 2012/02/17
- Prof @Hermida, who was on our podcast, won a UBC award for media outreach | @ubcjournalism http://t.co/BX4EsTFb 10 2012/02/17
- RT @gord_katic: Everything you need to know about chocolate by @tingkelly of @healthyUBC. http://t.co/29ItVe4x 10 2012/02/16
- Ratib Islam's provocative talk at the 2011 #TEDxTt, challenging the insular language of alternative medicine. http://t.co/ZCrlUuA6 10 2012/02/16
- Take a look at @J_McElroy's 2011 #TEDxTt on the future of media, through the lens of the @Ubyssey. http://t.co/3tQ8eHt3 10 2012/02/16
- Check out @pzaige's 2011 #TEDxTt on HIV, and the story behind the stigma. http://t.co/DwIWaL2s 10 2012/02/16
- RT @gord_katic: The UBC Journal of International Affairs is now accepting photo submissions+political cartoons until March 6th!! http:// ... 10 2012/02/10
- RT @irsa_ubc: ATTN: The JIA's first ever ESSAY CONTEST is now accepting submissions. Two prizes, $250 a piece http://t.co/1gXRcroS for d ... 10 2012/02/10
CATEGORIES
- (1)
- >archive (1362)
- >book review (7)
- >commentary (191)
- >creative (179)
- >education (123)
- >FAQs (24)
- >humour (82)
- >news (134)
- >reviews (19)
- >textbook (47)
- >ubc'er (187)
- Arctic (1)
- Art (9)
- ASIC200 (38)
- astronomy (3)
- biodiversity (44)
- Blogroll (2)
- borders (73)
- chatter (74)
- climate change (121)
- cognitive science (3)
- conferences (25)
- Cool Stuff (70)
- cultural criticism (77)
- development (112)
- economics (69)
- environment (168)
- ethics (9)
- events (121)
- Featured Posts (159)
- genetics (46)
- global (35)
- Global Speakers (9)
- health (78)
- history (4)
- homelessness (2)
- I have a story about… (6)
- journalism (2)
- math (2)
- opportunity (30)
- panda (5)
- philosophy (11)
- Podcast (3)
- politics (148)
- science (151)
- speakers (88)
- students politics (11)
- sustainability (170)
- technology (74)
- TEDxTt2009 (9)
- TEDxTt2010 (8)
- TEDxTt2011 (20)
- Terry Speakers (A/V) (32)
- Terry Wish (6)
- TT2008 (9)
- Vancouver (8)







Great stuff!
My only critiques are minor.. though I was worried you weren’t going to point out the unfairness in comparing natural decays/second between bananas and the uranium in a nuke. (In the latter case, the natural decay is sped up by many orders of magnitude during the chain reaction. If we could cause a similar chain reaction in bananas, their mild radioactivity would become dangerous!)
Minor, silly comments:
1. I think you used the atomic weight of Uranium to calculate the number of
uranium molecules in the bomb. U-235 will actually have an atomic weight
(probably the wrong term) very close to 235. (U-238 will be close to 238,
and since it’s the predominant isotype, the average atomic weight of U is
close to 238.)
2. I don’t know for sure, but I doubt Little Boy initiated fission when it hit the ground. More likely it detonated above ground. (Whereas assuming your bananas don’t break up meteorite-style, they’d detonate when they hit.)
Amazing. Also it’s sad because I ate 4 bananas today. Does the radioactivity affect the maximum number of bananas that we should eat per day?
Also in the wiki page of Banana Equivalent Dose, I noticed that Brazilian nuts also have a lot of radioactivity! Man, my favorite fruit AND nut are radioactive
@Jiyoon: I wouldn’t worry about it . The amount of radiation is incredibly small. You’re probably several orders of magnitude more likely to choke to death on the banana than suffer any sort of ill effects of the radiation.
Very interesting. Apparently Kiwi fruit has a much higher potassium content (per mass) than bananas, so I guess you would need less mass of kiwi to achieve the same effect.