Category Archives: cultural criticism

>archive Art UBC cultural criticism

Passing Encounters: Towards a Visual Archive of Vancouver Public Culture

There’s an interesting and short – it ends Friday – exhibition in the lobby of the Lasserre building (map).  Passing Encounters: Towards a Visual Archive of Vancouver Public Culture was put together by AHVA lecturer Alice Campbell and Prof. Charlotte Townshend-Gault.  The exhibition critiques the presentation and representation of a dominant visual culture in Vancouver. I’d say more, but I think the curatorial statement says plenty.  From the Facebook event page:

This exhibition offers a visual archive of Art History 376 and 377 students’ passing encounters with the multiple forms of Aboriginal representation that circulate in Vancouver’s public culture. Many of these are forms of Northwest Coast art and design. Others are forms of non-Northwest Coast Aboriginal art while others still are Non-Native produced imagery that trade on widely recognized icons and stereotypes. The ubiquity of these often ephemeral forms in Vancouver ensures that they are genuinely hegemonic: highly visible, yet seldom noticed.

This archive emerges from two class projects in which the students of Art History 376 and 377 (Arts of the Northwest Coast Peoples: The North and The South) in 2012/2013 photographed the Aboriginal and Aboriginal-inspired imagery that they encountered in their everyday lives. They used whatever cameras they had on hand, ranging from cell phone cameras to DSLRs. In both classes, students carefully noted what information about the objects and images is made available to passers-by and what is obscured. Students asked questions about the objects, including how they and the objects came to occupy the same space. They considered their own shifting relations to the objects, and how these are structured by the colonial past and its enduring effects in the present.

The individual photographs, and the archive as a whole, are material traces of the students’ everyday travels, spaces, histories and habits. They offer a situated perspective, determined by the spaces the students travel through, and the objects and images they encounter there. Alone and together, the photographs provoke reflections on the role these objects and images play in our everyday lives. They point to the complexity of Aboriginal life, presence and representation in this multicultural, cosmopolitan city.

The exhibition is experimental with respect to both curatorship and education. It’s an attempt to share the collective knowledge generated in our classrooms with a wider community. Just as these objects have come into visibility for the 376/377 students, we hope our audience will increasingly notice these objects and images in their everyday lives. In other words, the exhibition is not a passive representation of Northwest Coast art, but rather an active incitement to look, to notice, to reflect and to inquire.

+2
0
  
Canadian Politics UBC cultural criticism development economics environment events politics

#IdleNoMore at UBC – January 31st, 10:30am to 4:30pm

Photo by Caelie_Frampton (by-nc-sa/2.0)

Sophia says:

Recently a group of Indigenous and non-Indigenous students, faculty, and supporters have began to organize an event at UBC for January 31st. We share the core values of Idle No More which are peace, respect, and co-existence between all humanity and the natural world. Our objective is to resist the current government policies in a peaceful and respectful manner and ensure that each of us returns to balance and discontinue harming each other and the environment.

As students we are concerned about the lack of knowledge possessed by the UBC community on Indigenous histories and the current political issues, specifically Bill C-45 and Idle No More.

On January 31st from 10:30 am to 4:30pm we will be hosting a consciousness raising event to network with the UBC community. The event will include a line up of guest speakers (both Indigenous and non-Indigenous), artists, music (traditional and contemporary), and media coverage by CiTR. A march will begin at 10:30 from M.O.A. and end in front of the Goddess of Democracy statue around noon. The rest of the event will unfold from there.

For information on Idle No More Movement: http://idlenomore.ca/

A short video exploring the experiences of Aboriginal students in the classroom: http://www.whatilearnedinclasstoday.com/

Thank you.

+1
0
  
>humour TEDxTt2012 cultural criticism

TEDxTT 2012: “Your Boyfriend Wants to be Pretty,” Nick Thornton.

Occasionally, and probably not often enough, young men are told to embrace their feminine side. But what does getting in touch with your “feminine side” actually mean? Here, Nick Thornton (@unboringlearn), a 4th year History major at the University of British Columbia, provides a thought provoking and entertaining look at this question.

November 3rd, 2012. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Filmed by Craig Ross: Video edited by David Ng

In the spirit of ideas worth spreading, TEDx is a program of local, self-organized events that bring people together to share a TED-like experience. At a TEDx event, TEDTalks video and live speakers combine to spark deep discussion and connection in a small group. These local, self-organized events are branded TEDx, where x = independently organized TED event. The TED Conference provides general guidance for the TEDx program, but individual TEDx events are self-organized.* (*Subject to certain rules and regulations)

+3
0
  
>commentary cultural criticism

What I Learned at the Airport

by Nick Thornton

I was not going to join in on the debate and flurry of activity on the recent school shooting in Connecticut last week because, frankly, I didn’t have anything to add to the conversation. I’ve been pretty disgusted and turned off by the fact that everyone thinks they have something to say about the shootings. Yes, it’s nice to know people care and can show sympathy towards people who have had their lives destroyed by these heinous acts but this doesn’t necessarily make someone qualified to make an assessment on the intricacies of mental illness or gun control. For the record, I think those are valid conversations to have and SHOULD be had but maybe not by people who read one article on Huffington Post and are now an “expert” on such complex issues.

Like me, you’ve probably seen your facebook and twitter feed filled with heartbreaking headlines the last few days, usually accompanied by outrage, shock and empathy. Something that has been bugging me though, is the commentary that follows these posts, and the proliferation of the posts themselves. Undoubtedly, it’s important to be informed and to have debates on issues of vital importance but can we stop using people’s tragedy as our spring board for opinions? Yes, let’s have the conversations but how is posting pictures of people grieving being sensitive? It’s disgusting, amoral and sensationalist. Leave these poor people alone to grieve. Sticking cameras in children’s faces and snapping photos of families embracing outside of memorial services might make us feel better because it makes us sad and therefore like we care, but I see it only as one thing: a sick invasion of privacy and a vastly misplaced sense of empathy.

photo by http://americavisajobs.com/page/Arriving-in-America


So carrying around these feelings (and being outraged and shocked at the event) I went to pick up a friend at the airport on Saturday. The weather was grey and unforgiving and there was only one thing on people’s minds it seemed. Everyone had an angle, an opinion. My friend’s flight was delayed so I had to mill about the waiting area for an hour or so, with of course, the full 24 hour “special coverage” of the horrible details of the Connecticut shootings scrolling across all screens. Pundits were weighing in, field journalists speculated on motive and details and news anchors, barely able to contain their excitement over such a “story,” pontificated profoundly stupid questions to people trying to make sense of something horrible. I tried to ignore the news and resorted to people watching to take my mind off things.

After about twenty minutes, a woman who had been watching the news on the big screen turned around to walk away. She had apparently had enough too. Her eyes were red and streaked with tears. It’s likely she had no personal connection to the tragedy. She was just hurt and heartbroken. I doubt that woman, in that moment, had any opinion, any angle, she was just sad. And sometimes that’s enough. Sometimes there isn’t anything to say. Sometimes there just aren’t words.

Amidst all of this, the first batch of arrivals came through the doors off a flight from Sydney. Two young boys came racing through the automatic doors and actually did a full on “drop your bags and jump up on the people you’re waiting for” airport scene. It was pure, unbridled joy. They were so elated and more and more people came through and repeated this behaviour in more or less the same way. People cried and laughed and hugged each other hard. A group of young women waited jumping up and down for their long departed friend to arrive. There was one teenaged guy in the group who was determined not to cry but when his friend finally ran down the hallway, he burst into tears as well.

I still don’t have anything to say about what happened in Connecticut. Like all of you, I feel a whole range of things and am thinking hard about some serious issues that arise in moments like these. I don’t have any solutions or opinions, anything to wrap around this horrible event and make it all make sense. It doesn’t make sense to me and I’m not sure there is an answer. All I know is that when my friend came through that gate, I hugged her damn hard. Maybe that’s enough.

***Note: Before you comment, please read my opening carefully. I am not for a minute suggesting that debates on gun control and services for people suffering from mental illness shouldn’t be had. I think we would all do well however, to become better educated and listen for a while before spouting our opinions. I deeply hope this is what I have achieved here but am definitely open to criticism of that***

+11
0
  
Terry FAQ Vancouver cultural criticism politics

Transgender Human Rights FAQ: A Global Deficit

INTRODUCTION AND GLOBAL SIGNIFICANCE

A conversation between two UBC students, overhead on the grassy knoll…

Student A: Did you hear about the woman, Jenna Talackova, who was recently disqualified from the Miss Universe Canada pageant because she is transgender (HuffPost)? 

Student B: Yes, I heard about that this morning.

SA: It is an interesting story, but I don’t think I fully understand what it means to be transgender.

SB: Being transgender can mean different things for different people, but it most often refers to an individual who experiences a disconnect between their internally perceived gender and their physical sex.  Gender identity describes one’s internal sense of being male, female, or perhaps something else, while one’s physical sex refers to the biologically male or female body they were born into.  For transgender individuals, there is an incongruency between their gender identity and biological sex (PFLAG).

SA: I see, so a transgender individual may have an internal sense of being female, but their physical body is that of a male?

SB: That’s right.  It could also be a person who perceives themselves as male while living in a female body, or a person who does not fit neatly into either the male or female category, thus they “trans”cend gender.

SA: Interesting.  So what can transgender folks do about this incongruency in their identities?

SB: Well that really depends on the individual.  Some transgender people begin a physical transition in order to align their physical body with how they feel on the inside.  Often this will involve hormone treatments that masculinize or feminize their bodies, depending on their gender identity, and many transpeople opt to have surgeries which bring their physical bodies more in line with their gender identity.  It is important to note that there are also many transgender individuals who do not choose hormones or surgery in their transition process, and that all of these paths are equally valid.

Through these treatments most transgender people are seeking to alleviate a sense of body and gender “dysphoria.”  Gender dysphoria is a psychological term used to describe the feelings of pain, anguish, discomfort, and anxiety which occur as a result of the mismatch between a transperson’s gender identity and their physical sex (PFLAG).  Dysphoria is often heightened by the pressures the transgender person experiences from family, friends, and society as a whole, to conform conventional gender norms with which they do not identify (PFLAG).  The goal of physical transition is usually to help a transgender person feel more at home in their body and in their gender expression.

SA: I think I understand a little bit more about what it means to be a transgender person.  I know that we were speaking early about Jenna Talackova, who is a Canadian transgender woman, but I’m curious, are there transgender people all over the world?

SB: Certainly! There have been studies done all over the world which describe the experiences of transgender people.  In fact, communities in many countries have different names for transgender people, such as the hijras in India (Gurvinder, 1), and kathoey in Thailand (Nemoto, 210).  There are also many transgender people world-wide sharing their transition stories in online forums such as YouTube.  For example, the ‘FTM UK Official Collab Channel’ on YouTube is a site where female-to-male transgender people from the U.K. upload and share videos describing all aspects of their transition experience (FTM UK).  However, while countries and communities throughout the world have different names, laws, and support-systems for transgender people, trans people face a great deal of discrimination, both locally and globally.

SA: You spoke of different laws and support systems for transgender people.  I’m curious, would the experience of Jenna Talackova here in Canada be similar to the experience of a transgender person in another part of the world with regard to support and legal protection?

SB: That is a difficult question to answer because even transgender people within the same country can experience very different levels of support and legal protection depending on their proximity to urban areas and support systems (Egale 2012).  Furthermore, every country in the world has different attitudes towards, and laws protecting/discriminating against, transgender people.  Typically, transgender people in the Global North experience more support than do transgender people in the Global South.  What is important to note is that transgender individuals fall under the category of “sexual minorities” – a group that has long been discriminated against globally.  Some countries are moving to create laws to protect sexual minorities such as lesbians and gay men, however, transgender individuals are still overwhelmingly legally unprotected on a global level (ILGA, 2012).  Due to widespread discrimination and oppression, and a lack of concrete legal protection, trans-rights are a global issue.
read more »

+1
-1
  
Terry FAQ cultural criticism health

Body & Mind: An Eating Disorders FAQ

The Terry project is pleased to announce a new section in the Terry blog. Here, we will present excellent FAQs written in our ASIC200 on various topics of note. We aim to collect these remarkable papers, so that we can build a great repository of readings in socially responsible issues. Below is the first one by Kyla Jamieson – Enjoy!

- – -

Images by Kyla Jamieson - click on image to go to see more.

“World War IV, the war for freedom, is being fought inside our heads”[1]

Risk factors that have been identified for the development of eating disorders include “puberty, being female, societal emphasis on thinness, thin-ideal internalization, body dissatisfaction, unhealthy dieting, participation in activities that place substantial emphasis on body weight and shape, negative affect, adverse life events, childhood sexual and/or physical abuse, insecure attachment and family dysfunction.”[2]

- – -

What are eating disorders?

Eating disorders are psychological disorders that involve serious disturbances in eating behaviour. Currently recognized disorders include Anorexia (AN), Bulimia (BN), Binge Eating Disorder (BED) and Eating Disorders Not Otherwise Specified (EDNOS).  Anorexia is characterized by refusal to maintain a minimally normal weight for one’s age and height, as well as intense fear of weight gain, disturbed body image, and amenorrhea (missing period cycles). Bulimia involves eating large amounts of food in a short period of time and then vomiting, using laxatives, fasting or exercising excessively (binging and purging). Binge eating disorder involves binging without compensatory purging, and EDNOS is an umbrella term for eating disorders that do not fit the full diagnostic criteria for AN, BN, or BED.

Don’t most girls fear weight gain and have distorted body images, even without an eating disorder?

Yes, which is extremely worrying. A British study done in 2005 found that 47% of 6-year-old girls wanted to be slimmer in order to become more popular.[3] In Canada, 53% of healthy weight girls in grades 7-12 were trying to lose weight in 2008. Forty-six percent of girls reported dieting, 36% reported binge eating and 8% reported purging.[4] These statistics show that patterns of thinking and behaviour which are symptomatic of eating disorders are extremely prevalent in our society, and the number of young girls at risk of developing eating disorders is huge.

What is thinness bias?
Thinness bias is the pervasive belief that thinness correlates with health, strength of character, and beauty. Thinness bias contributes to the stigmatization of overweight and obese individuals and may explain why 47% of British 6-year-old girls want to be slimmer in order to become more popular,[1] and 53% of healthy weight Canadian girls in grades 7-12 were trying to lose weight in 2008. (Forty-six percent of girls reported dieting, 36% reported binge eating and 8% reported purging.)[5]

read more »

+1
0
  
>archive >commentary cultural criticism

Fostering That “Feminine Side”

by Nick Thornton

I googled "getting in touch with your feminine side" and this is what I got. Is it helping yet?

Occasionally, and probably not often enough, young men are told to embrace their feminine side. So out we go, attempting to be more in touch with our emotions. We call up a friend to go for coffee and we might even have a real conversation with them. We let our friend know that we are there for them if they ever need to chat or rant. We go away feeling pretty good about ourselves. We might try our hand at actually making a meal instead of ducking into the nearest sushi joint as we leap of our B-Line bus. So we get out that cook book our mother packed away in our stuff when we moved and we leaf through until we find something that will truly test our kitchen prowess.

But then it dawns on us, all of those things aren’t inherently feminine, they’re just some BS notions we picked up as a kid. This is just what our sociology prof was banging on about last semester. So we look to our girlfriends and girl friends. What do these girls do that makes them feminine? We analyze their gestures, their voice and inflections of speech… but that doesn’t seem like the right fit for us. If we changed our gestures people would throw things and laugh at us. Is it how they relate to one another? They seem to hug a lot, your girl friends, and they really like “girl’s nights.” But again, you see the same problem,
none of these things are inherently “feminine,” it’s just crap you notice because it’s re-enforced by every television show you’ve ever seen.

So where does that leave us? We’re still dissatisfied, not feeling quite at home being someone’s “brah, bro, broham” or otherwise. We like our guy friends but there’s an uneasiness in everything we do. That veneer is mighty thick. How exactly does one foster this elusive “feminine side” when so much of what is considered “feminine” is just arbitrary? You didn’t think I’d leave you without any tips, did you?

Step 1: Talk to your girl friends. Talk openly and honestly with no agenda, just talk to them. What have you been missing in the façade of trying to keep your own gender role tightly under wraps?

Step 2: Read. You can’t cultivate a hell of a lot with the same old information. Drop the insane idea that feminism will turn you into a man-hating sissy boy and read everything that you deem girly and feminist and stop worrying about having an appropriately “male” reaction.

Step 3: Experiment. Do what makes you happy. Do what you’ve always wanted to do. Play with gender until it makes no sense anymore because, surprise, it never made any sense to begin with.

What does getting in touch with your “feminine side” mean to you?
Nick is a 4th year History major at UBC, as well as the CEO (and sole employee) of Unboring Learning.com, a free online learning site. His 5th grade report card said: "Nick is a conscientious student but distracts his classmates." You can follow him on Twitter: @unboringlearn

+14
0