Conservative minded Americans more likely to hold onto misinformation?
The title may seem like a low-blow, but according to a study done by political scientists at Yale, it appears to be the case. From the Washington post:
Political scientists Brendan Nyhan and Jason Reifler provided two groups of volunteers with the Bush administration’s prewar claims that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. One group was given a refutation — the comprehensive 2004 Duelfer report that concluded that Iraq did not have weapons of mass destruction before the United States invaded in 2003. Thirty-four percent of conservatives told only about the Bush administration’s claims thought Iraq had hidden or destroyed its weapons before the U.S. invasion, but 64 percent of conservatives who heard both claim and refutation thought that Iraq really did have the weapons. The refutation, in other words, made the misinformation worse.
Broadly speaking (although not entirely true), arguing with a conservative just might double their chances of gripping onto what has been proven incorrect. Of course this has plenty riding on it as the US election ramps up to its close, and the Canadian election gets started. As Dan Sweeney at the Huffington Post said,
[W]hat’s a leftie to do?
I ain’t got the answers, ace, except to say this: When arguing with conservatives in front of on-the-fence independents, remember that you’re not trying to convince the conservative to actually buy into silly notions like facts and reason. You’re highlighting the differences between left and right for the outside observer. If the other guy insists on political views that belong only in Disney World’s Fantasyland, other folks will realize what’s happening.
I’m curious what, if any, are the physiological and environmental bases for such behaviour? Do any of you have an idea? Is this a field of active study – what factors lead to one’s politicization?
6 Responses to Conservative minded Americans more likely to hold onto misinformation?
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
(Click on image to watch video)
OUR BLOGGERS
VINCI AU
posts | twitter
JESSIKA BAROI
posts
bobbi
posts| twitter | website
TREENA.C
posts | twitter | website
CHISALA CHAMAOMBE
posts | website
MICHELLE GYENES
posts| twitter
SALIMA HIRJI
posts | twitter

BETH HONG
posts | twitter | website
JEANNINE
posts| twitter | website
GORDON KATIC
posts| twitter | website
ALEC LEE
posts | website
DAVE SEMENUIK
posts| website | website
SARA SHAYAN
posts | web
JOSEPHINE XU
posts | twitter | website
KINOZHAO
posts| twitter
DAVID NG
posts| twitter | website
RECENT COMMENTS
- natasha on Laura Bain – Living with Bipolar Type II – TEDxTerryTalks 2011
- Rachel Gutman on Chad Hyson
- Michael Matthews on Chad Hyson
- Urooba!A on The Terry Project in 2011/2012: A Year of Change
- » 52 WEEKS- WEEK 15: Passionate People, Jackie Chong on Chasing Down Passion: Jacqueline Chong
- Justin on The Terry Project in 2011/2012: A Year of Change
- The Terry Project in 2011/2012: A Year of Change | Terry on Laura Fukumoto – Obesity in Light of the Zombie Apocalypse – TEDxTerryTalks2011
- The Terry Project in 2011/2012: A Year of Change | Terry on Selecting speakers for the Global Speakers Series
- The Terry Project in 2011/2012: A Year of Change | Terry on Justin McElroy – Media & Their Communities: An Evolution in the 21st Century – TEDxTerryTalks2011
- The Terry Project in 2011/2012: A Year of Change | Terry on NOTES ON THE CLIMATE FIGHT (VIDEO) BILL McKIBBEN, NOVEMBER 16, 2011
- The Terry Project in 2011/2012: A Year of Change | Terry on Introducting the new Terry Project iPhone/iPad App
- Kavita Ramdas » 夢と愛の千夜一夜 on The Terry Global Speaker Series Presents: Kavita Ramdas
- 4 sweet events coming up on campus | miriam on The Terry Global Speaker Series Presents: Kavita Ramdas
- The Terry Project Podcast #8: Food and Power | Terry on Introducting the new Terry Project iPhone/iPad App
- Fabiola on Children and War: Modern Transitions of Violence
POPULAR POSTS
- ASIC 200
- FAQ - Stem Cells (Sa Mix)
- ASIC 200 (COURSE OUTLINE 2012)
- St. Matthew's Island
- THE PROS AND CONS OF MOVING TO CANADA
- ABOUT
- The Terry Global Speaker Series Presents: Kavita Ramdas
- The 2012 Arts Last Lecture: George Stroumboulopoulos
- Hussein Janmohamed - Choral Music: The Road to Harmony and Peace - TEDxTerryTalks2011
FOLLOW TERRY!
- What would it be like to die in a black hole? @Neiltyson explains, and it's not pretty. http://t.co/qf1A31RC /via @openculture 10 2012/05/21
- How worried are you about Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon? We're speaking with @LarryKorb of @amprog tomorrow, for our next podcast. 10 2012/05/21
- Does anyone with a thick Russian accent want to be on our podcast? We need somebody to read a couple lines. 10 2012/05/18
- @ghoberg I had you on a @terryubc list, but now I have you on my own. thx for letting me know. 10 2012/05/15
- What's with the crazy attack on censuses?? First the Canadians cut out the long form, now Americans slash their budget. http://t.co/KgPc5QLq 10 2012/05/15
- Put a western-style city in the middle of a banana republic? Crazy idea that just might work? Or just colonialism? http://t.co/s0LyUvSh 10 2012/05/15
- "There is not a real constituency for normal." Interesting, provocative @TVO talk on over-diagnosis of mental illness. http://t.co/HTWqRkWy 10 2012/05/14
- RT @gord_katic: A brief history of the banana, by @unboringlearn. Slavery, colonialism, rapacious corporations, overthrown governments. ... 10 2012/05/13
- RT @Ng_Dave: Looking for UBC science-y faculty who are curious about artistic collaborations (Also game on with STS or philosophy types) ... 10 2012/05/10
- RT @tierneymilne: The adorable @gord_katic and @terryubc just gave me this wonderful thank you gift- perfect for a new UBC Alumnus:) htt ... 10 2012/05/09
CATEGORIES
- (1)
- >archive (1370)
- >book review (7)
- >commentary (191)
- >creative (181)
- >education (123)
- >FAQs (24)
- >humour (82)
- >news (134)
- >reviews (19)
- >textbook (47)
- >ubc'er (187)
- Arctic (1)
- Art (9)
- ASIC200 (38)
- astronomy (3)
- biodiversity (44)
- Blogroll (2)
- borders (73)
- chatter (75)
- climate change (121)
- cognitive science (3)
- conferences (25)
- Cool Stuff (70)
- cultural criticism (80)
- development (113)
- economics (69)
- environment (168)
- ethics (9)
- events (125)
- Featured Posts (165)
- genetics (46)
- global (36)
- Global Speakers (10)
- health (79)
- history (4)
- homelessness (2)
- I have a story about… (6)
- journalism (2)
- math (2)
- opportunity (30)
- panda (5)
- philosophy (11)
- Podcast (5)
- politics (148)
- science (152)
- speakers (88)
- students politics (11)
- sustainability (170)
- technology (74)
- TEDxTt2009 (9)
- TEDxTt2010 (8)
- TEDxTt2011 (21)
- Terry Speakers (A/V) (32)
- Terry Wish (6)
- TT2008 (9)
- Vancouver (8)







Biological weapons were found, but not remotely in the numbers expected. Over 500 tons of yellowcake were shipped out of Iraq by our government this summer. This amount is sufficient to make over 100 nuclear weapons and is evidence of Saddam’s ongoing intent to develop nuclear weapons. Further, Republicans and Democrats including the Clintons, Kerry, and many others who voted for war in Iraq had access to the same intelligence that George Bush had. Several bipartisan investigations concluded that the administration did not place pressure on the CIA to cook the books in favor of war in Iraq. The vast majority in the CIA are trying to undermine the President anyway. Why would they go along with an effort to falsify intelligence? The head of the CIA was a Clinton appointee. Hating George Bush is not reason enough to ignore the facts. What’s a leftie to do? Try dealing with the real world and real facts and not bogus information from the fever swamps of the far left.
BuffaloBill’s comment is further proof that the research cited above is correct.
Baddaboom! Point awarded to glennw98.
Do yourself a favor and read the whole article, including the first part where it says liberals showed the same stupid effect.
This blogger explains:
http://higgsblogon.blogspot.com/2008/09/dan-sweeney-should-be-ashamed-of.html
I haven’t read the original study, but based on the Washington Post article, they didn’t show the same effect. What they showed was that the percent of liberals that clung on to their refuted information didn’t drop to the control group percent. However, the republicans shown a refutation were more likely to believe the refuted material (i.e. this percent increased – the percent of liberals decreased, but not to control levels). This is the “backfire effect” the Post article mentions, and a fundamentally different result from the liberals.
[...] Dave S.: Conservative minded Americans more likely to hold onto misinformation? [...]